In every political struggle the ascension of the insurgent force is fraught with peril. At each stage of the contest, dissolution, dilution, or destruction is risked. On either side of us, defeat lurks. Can we bear forward on the straight and true path, the path which will lead us most quickly to victory? Even though I am confident that eventual success is assured and inevitable, it may not necessarily be imminent. Our failure of will can cause it to be delayed, just as the fear and hesitancy of the Israelites delayed their entry into the promised land. The wrong turn may leave us wandering in the wilderness of multiculturalism longer than we must. Likewise, the outcome of the demographic war is promised, but not necessarily as certain may be the outcome of every battle along the way.
Politics, and indeed life itself, is often like that. Things which now seem to have been pre-ordained in hindsight, weren’t always a sure bet. Who could have foreseen the Berlin Wall coming down without a missile being launched, from the perspective of the height of the Cold War just a few years previously? Who would have thought the Titanic would sink, standing there watching it leave the dock on its maiden voyage? Most things which were, might not have been, and vice-versa.
What if, for example, the F.B.I had publicly released their evidence that Martin Luther King, Jr., was a communist-trained plagiarist and womanizer? Or that Rosa Parks was a professional activist, similarly schooled at the Highlander Folk Academy? How might that have affected the ascendancy of the civil rights movement? As an author who was written alternate history yarns in books such as ‘Déjà Vu’ and ‘Look Away’, it’s easy enough for me to speculate on a thousand different “what if?”’s. We’ve all played that game in our minds many times, using countless points in history as our divergence into a parallel universe, dystopian or otherwise.
A far more cogent concern to our present, and our future, is what happens next to our current political dialectic. Does it continue to get nudged further to the right, as White Nationalism is mainstreamed through civic nationalism? Will we throw a brick through the Overton Window? Or, will the sharpest edge of the movement which has incised itself so deeply into the journalistic consciousness of the mainstream media become blunted and dulled through co-option as a controlled opposition? Surely that moderative aspect of the dialectic is not inevitable? If so, we must stand ready to serve both as thesis and our own antithesis, just as our enemies always have done.
Over the past month, countless news articles and broadcasts have vivisected, laid out in the open air, and introduced the Alt Right and its attendant beliefs to the politically aware public. Our enemies have been busily normalizing the meme and the message, sanitizing it and lending it an air of unprecedented acceptability, if not respectability. White Nationalism is now a part of the nation’s audible discourse. We have the nation’s attention, and contrary to moments in the past when the controlled media has spotlighted White Nationalists, they aren’t solely focusing on the least presentable, the most fringe of our admittedly fringed world. That tells me that they have something else in mind; co-option and dilution, rather than exclusion. Our will is what decides whether they may be successful, or not.
How, you may ask, could the Alt Right be co-opted? Simply enough. All that has to happen for it to be sidelined, is for the newfound attention of the amorphous movement to attract an influx of more moderate neophytes who’ve not had the time and experience to undergo full education and radicalization. Let’s face it, understanding the Jewish question, insofar as the multifaceted origins and cause and effect relationships of the Jews to the rest of humanity goes, seldom comes quickly or easily. It requires longer study and research, if not instruction and guidance, to fully comprehend, than interracial crime statistics, for example. Similarly, and especially for many of the millennials who are being introduced to White Nationalism through the auspices of the Alt Right for the first time now, illegal immigrants present a much more clear and present danger than homosexuals, whom many of them have endured a lifetime of academic indoctrination and media brainwashing to accept as normalized, themselves. Already, there is a presence of homosexuals such as Milo and Jack Donovan, and Jews such as Seidel and Cernovitch, within the Alt Right. Just as insidious are those like Anglin and Watson who have or have had sexual relations with nonWhites. It is as true now as it was when it was uttered in 1964, moderation is no virtue; and extremism is no vice.
What those of us who hold firm to the values, principles, and ideals of our Founding Fathers who drafted the Naturalization Act of 1790 owe to the Alt Right, is its purification. We must serve as radical flank effects in contract to those such as Spencer and Taylor, regardless of how much of the spotlight they garner, who would allow Asians or Jews or homosexuals within the ranks of our struggle. And, how do we do that? We do that be taking instruction from our enemies, who fear revelation more than anything. The worst insult imaginable, the most offensive thing which one can call a Jew, is simply that; Jew. It bears within its single syllable the instinctual memory of a thousand years of nation-wrecking and homogeneity undermining, of plotting and scheming; and of 109 resulting pogroms, smoke which certainly issued forth from some fire. Indeed, name the Jew. Whenever one insinuates itself into Alt Right discussions or is quoted by a perhaps innocently unsuspecting, well intentioned White, call them out. Whenever someone quotes a source with a history of race mixing, or a nonWhite spouse, or who is a homosexual, call them out. Even if it embarrasses them momentarily, call them out. You have a duty to your people, and to our cause, to not remain silent in the face of co-option. If they are worthy, some day they will thank you for it, if only in their hearts. If not, you will have served your folk as God and nature’s laws require. Let’s keep them honest, and keep them pure. Those who are lukewarm or corrupted, let us spew out.
We will soon see an accelerated push of Jews and even Asians and homosexuals seeking acceptance and admission into the Alt Right. They would dilute our will, and our principles and values. It is our responsibility to push back. It is up to us to define what the Alt Right is, and what it will be. Don’t leave it to our enemies to define us. We did not get here by being politically correct and rolling over and peeing to keep from hurting people’s feelings. We will not achieve victory via balkanization by allowing our time, energies, and resources to be co-opted into more moderate civic nationalism, or more inclusionary alliances. Polarization is not the threat. Polarization is the solution.
Too broad of an alliance with too disparate of forces who were not as trustworthy and committed to the same struggle, and many of whom were working within or for the system, caused a defeat in 1923 which postponed political success for a decade, once before. Let us not make the same mistake, again. I’ve already proven one doesn’t have to be in jail to write a book.
What we owe the Alt Right is the same thing which we would ask of it. The truth. Don’t let us down.
Billy Roper
An author of both fiction and nonfiction books, Billy Roper is a former high school and junior high History, Civics, Economics, and Geography teacher. He has been a candidate for public office, a lifelong political activist, leader, and spokesman. Mr. Roper has a Bachelor’s degree in History and Political Science and a Master of Liberal Arts degree in History with a specialty in Anthropology. He currently resides with his wife, stepson, and other animals in what will become New America. Mr Roper’s books can be found on AMAZON HERE
Source: Divine-Truth Ministries
