Immigration Invasion

Movie of the Year Pick For 2016 by Billy Roper

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

Movie of the Year Pick For 2016

By Billy Roper

https://i1.wp.com/divine-truth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/AngryBirds-300x231.png

Over the Christmas weekend, my family and I enjoyed several movies together, from the traditional Holiday classics A Miracle on 34th Street, Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer, Ernest Saves Christmas, and It’s a Wonderful Life, to my personal pick for 2016 movie of the year, The Angry Birds Movie. Wait, what? Hold up, right?

I know, being surrounded at best by people whom, if they know who and what we are, practice the cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy of reciting to us their own long-reserved litany of racial remarks in a cathartic release, before denying actually being racist or understanding why we see the world as we do, it’s easy enough to grasp at straws. In (current year), any t.v. show or movie which doesn’t feature transgendered pansexual biracial adoptions and at least ten lines of Yiddish in the credits seems downright Alt-Right. But I think I’m not reading too much between the animated lines of this cartoon movie loosely based on the still-trendy smartphone app game when I say, hey, it carried a good lesson. Without too many of the adult joke innuendoes which make so many ostensibly children’s movies awkward to watch with the family (for those still masterbuilding to the Lego movie), this animated feature is a good egg. Better yet, its morale, from my perch, has a real sunny side. Work with me here:

Red is a disgruntled, cynical, disillusioned bird. Underneath his hard shell, though, he’s pretty scrambled. Something of a recluse, he’s nearly downright anti-social, as far as the nesting community goes, and doesn’t fit in. But he’s not as hard-boiled as he seems. Now, this is not a regurgitated Aesop’s fable. In the kumbaya kingdom of Bird Island, Red calls out the authorities and the establishment for being fakes and liars, while the cuck-a-doodle-do avians are all shocked by his inappropriate rage. In fact, after exposing a charlatan judge, Red gets sentenced to Anger Management class. He had ruffled the wrong feathers, this time. About then I started thinking that this Finnish-created project was going to melt away into a harmless animated version of an Adam Sandler movie, but I was surprised. You will be, too.

The anger management class is run by a liberal hippie chick. Big whoop, right? But the anthropomorphic fun takes a political turn when strangers show up. They’re green pigs from another island who claim to come in peace, but Red, jaded bird that he is, doesn’t trust them. While the new visitors come preaching brotherhood and acceptance and love, they seem to be hiding just how many of themselves there are, as well as their true intentions. Then, they keep coming, and coming, and coming, ship after ship. The immigrants lull most of the birds into complacency by providing new and exciting entertainment and exotic distractions. The cultural enrichment continues, even after Red and two fellow-doubters begin to uncover the downside of immigration. The bird judge and sheriff bird turn on Red and his friends, chastising them for “making their guests uncomfortable”.  The bird sheriff, by the way, looks remarkably like Angela Merkel. A group called “Hamnesty International” starts building homes for the new arrivals. Things get ugly when it’s revealed that the newcomers don’t come in peace seeking a better life after all. In fact, they’re there to steal the most obvious symbols of the birds’ futures, their very bloodline, their eggs.

Red and his angry bird allies seek the help of the legendary Great Eagle, who turns out to be less of a fearless hero and leader than they’ve been hatched to believe. In the end, spoiled egg alert, the birds invade the land which the immigrants came from, take back their future, and blow the pigs up into bacon strips. During the climactic battle one of the invaders’ armored cars even features a prominent “tolerance” bumper sticker. My jaw dropped.

Astounded, I kept waiting for the surviving pigs to see the error of their ways, or for a faction of good pigs to revolt and overthrow their porcine Muslim-bearded dictator, but it never happened. There was no “not all pigs are bad, some are just like us” caveat to take the curse off of the blatantly anti-immigrant, anti-refugee message. The Angry Birds Movie ended with the anti-immigrant activists becoming heroes, in fact, as the anger management class students ultimately save the day. There is so much obvious symbolism present that it could not all be accidental.

One strange thing about Bird Island is that all of the residents except their overrated hero are flightless, but only when they get angry do they learn to soar. They lose faith in their lazy, self-absorbed icon, before deciding to get the job done on their own. Are you listening to their song? And no, I don’t mean the Limp Bizkit version of Behind Blue Eyes, either. The truth is often hard to swallow, but we have to keep pecking away, as a cardinal rule.

Since the green pig invaders do come bearing gifts and introduce some technological innovations like TNT, sling-shots, and helium balloons, some might be tempted to think of this as an anticolonialism movie, and they’re welcome to do so, if they wish. Despite the best efforts of liberals, though, I believe the narrative of immigrants and refugees has shifted so much in our favor during 2016 that most viewers will be more likely to birdwatch the cute little cartoon as I did, as a repudiation of Merkel and Obama’s open door policies.

The fearless leader, Mighty Eagle, (the United States) claims that he wasn’t lazy but instead deliberately made the birds lose faith in him so they could find faith in themselves. Whatever, dude, the job got done. During the closing credits it is revealed a small number of the immigrants did survive the war, but rather than becoming good little piggies, they’re still plotting stealing the birds’ future, true to their piggy nature. Then the three fledgling bluebirds Red saved from certain death as Piggy Island blew up are seen launching themselves into the sky.

The Angry Birds Movie grossed $107.5 million in North America and $242.2 million in other territories for a worldwide total of $349.7 million. Worldwide, it is the second highest-grossing video game film of all-time, behind Warcraft ($433.5 million).

I’m sure that the Jewish and liberal actors who did the voice-overs for the birds and pigs won’t agree with my assessment. As with most on the mainstream reviewers, what I feel to be the true insinuation of The Angry Birds Movie, at least unconsciously and subliminally, might be, wait for it…over their heads. But for this viewer, watching it on a family Christmas Eve night, the animated app movie was all about the merits of giving wings to your anger.

Take back your eggs. Let fly your angry bird.

Looking for an image to accompany this article, I found that, indeed, polarized minds think alike:

http://heatst.com/entertainment/angry-birds-has-weirdly-become-this-years-divisive-immigration-movie/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcIxf1Xb78I

 

http://fusion.net/story/261690/alt-right-angry-birds-movie-theory-8chan-4chan/

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/4jtcwd/is_there_some_controversy_with_the_angry_birds/

 

http://imgur.com/gallery/nfMe6KZ

 

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=54861

 

http://coed.com/2016/05/23/angry-birds-movie-racism-refugee-crisis-leopirate-theory-video-review/

 

https://www.inverse.com/article/16490-donald-trump-supporting-white-supremacists-really-love-the-angry-birds-movie

 

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/new-angry-birds-movie-racist-xenophobic.3250899/

 

https://www.quora.com/Is-the-new-Angry-Bird-movie-a-veiled-criticism-of-mass-immigration

 

Well, how did I miss this cartoon, and the surrounding controversy about it, all year long? I need to watch more kids’ movies, I guess.

Birds of a feather, flock together.

Billy Roper

An author of both fiction and nonfiction books, Billy Roper is a former high school and junior high History, Civics, Economics, and Geography teacher. He has been a candidate for public office, a lifelong political activist, leader, and spokesman. Mr. Roper has a Bachelor’s degree in History and Political Science and a Master of Liberal Arts degree in History with a specialty in Anthropology. He currently resides with his wife, stepson, and other animals in what will become New America. Mr Roper’s books can be found on AMAZON HERE

The David Duke Show 9/30/16 (Dr. Patrick Slattery fills in)

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

Patrick Slattery and Mark Collette discuss Brexit, the British immigration situation, and what can be done.

Today Dr. Slattery filled in for Dr. Duke. His guest for the hour was Mark Collette from the United Kingdom. They started off by talking about the aftermath of the Brexit vote, and the prospects for the UK actually withdrawing from the EU. Then they went on to the immigration situation, which was the motivating factor for the Brexit vote.

Many cities in the UK have lost or are on the way to losing their British majority as the immigrant populations have far higher birthrates than native Brits. This immigrant baby boom is subsidized by the British taxpayers, who then tend to hold down their own reproduction due to concerns they cannot financially provide for their families. Meanwhile, the culture is rapidly Islamizing, and crime rates are going through the roof. They discuss what can be done to rectify the situation.

Duke for Senate

In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! by Ann Coulter Book Review

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

indextwt

In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! by Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter has just released a new book just in time for the 2016 presidential election in November. The motif of her new book is the ascendancy of Donald Trump in the Republican primary, as we now look toward the general election, where he will be going head-to-head with the evil pant-suited lesbian beast Hillary Clinton.  Ann Coulter played a part in the success of Donald Trump that is little known, but still very crucial to the success of his campaign. I assume by releasing this book she intends to cash-in on the success of the new Trumpian movement, who she helped influence. Ann Coulter had released a book prior to this one called Adios America: The Left’s Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole, which addressed the immigration invasion we have been facing for decades now. She did a very good job with that book and Donald Trump took notice. He called the book a great read, and it helped influence his immigration reform policy that we all hold dear today.

This is a short and simple book that can be read very quickly in a day or two. In Trump We Trust details the battle that Donald Trump has unwittingly engaged in with the Jewish-controlled media. Ann Coulter does a magnificent job showing the clear cut media bias against Trump. She of course never does so much as mentions the culprits, but we should be grateful for what she is comfortable doing. Ann Coulter is no White Nationalist, but I have some respect for her because she helps point people in our direction. Ann Coulter is the only White Woman in the mainstream who is helping bridge the gap into our movement. Her books are not an end in themselves, but they can be a means for us toward our end of enlightening our people on the real issues that we face. Ann Coulter does a good job pointing out the symptoms of our destruction, but never gets to the crux of the matter i.e. Jewish-Domination. I am sure she understands the Jewish question at least somewhat, but if she addressed it she would no longer be published, and in turn would loose her lavish lifestyle.

As I have already said this a short book and gets right to the point. This book details the rise of Donald Trump thus far and all the obstacles he has faced as the Jewish media has tried and failed with every trick in the book to destroy him. It really is amazing that for once we have a candidate who although he gives lip service to the Jews is not a 100% kosher approved candidate. Not only is he not that, he is even hated by the vast majority of Jews. And for this reason we should support him even more fervently. In Trump We Trust is filled with Ann Coulter’s signature humor, which can often be enjoyable.

I bought this book at Barnes and Noble with a 40% off coupon. So I got the book for under $10.00 and quickly sold it for $10.00 after reading it. I would not recommend our people buying or even reading this book. Instead if you are interested in reading a book by Ann Coulter, read the aforementioned book Adios America. There is some value in In Trump We Trust, but not enough to justify a purchase. On the other hand Adios America does a good job delineating the immigration problem, especially for the layman.  Maybe someday someone will write a book called Trump and the Jews detailing the surreptitious war of deception that they have unleashed on Donald Trump. Now that would be a book I would love to read.

The following are some quotes that Adolf Hitler put so succinctly that pretty much sum up why we should support Donald Trump:

“Every Jewish slander and every Jewish lie is a scar of honor on the body of our warriors”

-Adolf Hitler

“Anyone who picks up a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does not see himself slandered in it has not made profitable use of the previous day; for If he had, he would be persecuted, reviled, slandered, abused, befouled.”

-Adolf Hitler

If we take these quotes at face value then obviously Donald Trump is serving our cause.

Michael Jeffrey

 

In Trump We Trust by Ann Coulter Book Review Coming Soon

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ 1 Comment

indextwt

In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! by Ann Coulter

Donald Trump isn’t a politician — he’s a one-man wrecking ball against our dysfunctional and corrupt establishment. We’re about to see the deluxe version of the left’s favorite theme: Vote for us or we’ll call you stupid. It’s the working class against the smirking class.

Now Ann Coulter, with her unique insight, candor, and sense of humor, makes the definitive case for why we should all join his revolution.

The three biggest news stories of the 2016 presidential election have been: Trump, Trump, and Trump. The media have twisted themselves in knots, trying to grasp how he won over millions of Republicans and what he’d be like as president.

But Ann Coulter isn’t puzzled. She knows why Trump was the only one of seventeen GOP contenders who captured the spirit of our time. She gets the power of addressing the pain of the silent majority and saying things the “PC Thought Police” considers unspeakable.

She argues that a bull in the china shop is exactly what we need to make America great again.

In this powerful book, Coulter explains why conservatives, moderates, and even disgruntled Democrats should set aside their doubts and embrace Trump:

·He’s putting America first in our trade deals and alliances, rather than pandering to our allies and enemies.

·He’s abandoned the GOP’s decades-long commitment to a bellicose foreign policy, at a time when the entire country is sick of unnecessary wars.

·He’s ended GOP pandering to Hispanic activists with his hard-line policy on immigration. Working class Americans finally have a champion against open borders and cheap foreign labor.

·He’s overturned the media’s traditional role in setting the agenda and defining who gets to be considered “presidential.”

·He’s exposed political consultants as grifters and hacks, most of whom don’t know real voters from a hole in the ground.

If you’re already a Trump fan, Ann Coulter will help you defend and promote your position. If you’re not, she might just change your mind.

Book Review Coming Soon.

La Reconquista by Billy Roper

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

hispanic_population_in_the_united_states_and_the_former_mexican-american_border

La Reconquista by Billy Roper

After his meeting with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, the Mexican president fired a government Finance Minister who had suggested he invite and sit down with the GOP contender in Mexico City. Then, a Mexican Senator,  Armandos Rios Piter, drafted and presented to the Mexican congress a bill which would, among other things, cancel the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo between Mexico and the United States. That treaty ceded control over the territory comprising California and Texas to the United States, from Mexico, following the Mexican-American War. Guess who won that match-up?

Many Hispanics on both sides of the border consider the land Mexico lost by war and treaty and sale (the Gadsden Purchase) to the United States as still being theirs, legally, historically, culturally, and racially. Former Mexican president Vincente Fox declared that ‘Mexico is where Mexicans are!’. These activists proclaim  “todo por la raza”, “everything for the race”, and they don’t mean NASCAR. They’ve stated repeatedly that what they intend is ‘La Reconquista’, a reconquering, of the southwestern U.S.. Frankly, it looks like they’re doing a pretty darn good job of it, so far. Some of them want the territory to be an independent Hispanic nation, called “Aztlan”, while others just want it to become a part of Mexico, again.

Piter, the Mexican Senator, is affiliated with the PRD, the Party of Democratic Revolution, a far left, Communist oriented political movement which is influential  in rural Mexico. He represents the state of Guerrero, in southern Mexico, which has been the focal point of anti-government rebellions by indigenous peoples, and draconian, by U.S. standards, efforts by the government to stop the large-scale immigration of Guatemalans and other illegals into Mexico. Of all 32 Mexican states, Guerrero is currently the largest source of illegal immigrants from Mexico into the United States. Although tourism, largely by Americans, is the single biggest income producer for Guerrero, many of whom live there permanently, Piter also proposed levying taxes on American citizens living in Mexico equal to the amount of remittance funds sent back to Mexico by illegal immigrants in the U.S. which would be lost, if they ceased. Trump has proposed blocking remittances to Mexico by illegal immigrants in the U.S. by requiring proof of citizenship I.D. in order to send wire transfers through services such as Western Union, as a means of paying for the proposed border wall. That number is estimated to equal close to 25 billion dollars annually, more than Mexico receives each year in oil revenue.

http://www.kvue.com/news/local/mexican-senator-preps-for-fight-if-trump-wins/315633193

While the proposed bill has initially been well received by Mexican lawmakers, it would only be voted on, apparently, if Trump is elected and the NAFTA free trade agreement was cancelled.

Now, this ‘Reconquista’. Have you visited a border state lately? De facto, it’s already happening. De jure, abdication of federal power through a crisis (grid collapse, war, economic depression, another two terms by a Democrat, am I being redundant?) would allow statewide referendums of the majority Hispanic populations of those areas for independence or rejoining Mexico. Kind of like the Russian citizens of the Crimean peninsula did last year, except easier, and with wider margins of support. Every day more Whites move out of the southwest, and every day more Mexicans move in, legally and otherwise. That’s not even counting unbalanced birth and death rates between the races. Sanctuary cities become sanctuary counties, then sanctuary states. Hispanics gain control of city councils, Mayoral offices, police departments, state legislatures, then state governments. Who can blame them? Would you vote to exclude your cousins, aunts, or uncles from your new country? At some point, the peppermint stripe comes down, and the eagle snacking on snake goes up.

https://www.amazon.com/Balk-What-does-Americas-future/dp/1515371816/ref=sr_1_1_twi_pap_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1473515783&sr=8-1&keywords=The+Balk

Right now, they’re blackmailing us into maintaining NAFTA. If it’s cancelled, they’ll open up the borders on their side, like a landwards Marianna boat lift. There’s more than one form of invasion. Simple demographic replacement can be just as effective as bombs and bayonets.

Here’s a likely scenario. Hillary is elected.  A “common sense” “path to citizenship” is put into place through Executive Actions which allow, say, 10 million of the 15 to 20, or 25, (we don’t even know) million illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. to become registered Democrats. Every ten years in the U.S., we have a census. Currently, a new congressional representative is apportioned for about every 700,000 new heads counted. District lines are redrawn, either shrunk to make room for more or expanded if population increases and the representation decreases. Rather than hiding and being hard to count, we’d then know exactly how many of them there were, because instead of ducking the door to door Census counters, they’ll be voting, and voting is overwhelmingly spelled with a capitol ‘D’ in Spanish.

So, 10 million more Hispanic citizens, being conservative with the number, would equal about 15 new congressional seats, in majority Hispanic new districts. That would cement California as a ‘blue’ state, no surprise, but it also would do for Texas and Arizona, and maybe Florida and Virginia, currently swing states, because that’s how the electoral college votes of states is apportioned. What that means is that after the next Census in 2020, in time for for the 2024 presidential race for sure, it would be virtually impossible for any non-liberal, open borders candidate to ever be elected President of the United States, ever again. That’s just electoral college reality. Math is racist.

I don’t believe Trump is a panacea. Heck, I don’t even think he’s sincere. And, believing that what cannot fly must fall, and worse is better in the long term, I don’t wish to draw out and prolong the death of this former nation any longer than it has to last. Enjoy the last couple of months of the gladiatorial games. However things go in November, eventually, the scenario above will happen, and that will be a major step towards the balkanization of the United States.

 

New America. It’s coming.

Source: Divine-Truth

 

Is Tide Going Out on Hillary? by Patrick J. Buchanan

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Were the election held today, Hillary Clinton would probably win a clear majority of the Electoral College.

Her problem: The election is two months off.

Sixty days out, one senses she has lost momentum — the “Big Mo” of which George H. W. Bush boasted following his Iowa triumph in 1980 — and her campaign is in a rut, furiously spinning its wheels.

The commander in chief forum Wednesday night should have been a showcase for the ex-secretary of state’s superior knowledge and experience.

Instead, Clinton looked like a witness before a grand jury, forced to explain her past mistakes and mishandling of classified emails at State.

“Of the two candidates,” The New York Times reported, “Mrs. Clinton faced by far the tougher and most probing questions from the moderator, Matt Lauer of NBC, and from an audience of military veterans about her use of private email, her vote authorizing the Iraq war, her hawkish foreign policy views…”

On defense most of the time, Clinton scored few points.

And with a blistering attack on Lauer, the Times all but threw in the towel and conceded that the Donald won the night.

“Moderator of Clinton-Trump Forum Fields A Storm of Criticism,” was the headline as analyst Michael Grynbaum piled on:

“Mr. Lauer found himself besieged on Wednesday evening by critics of all political stripes, who accused the anchor of unfairness, sloppiness, and even sexism in his handling of the event.”

When your allies are ripping the refs, you’ve probably lost the game.

Indeed, in this dress rehearsal for the debates, Donald Trump played Trump, while Clinton was cast in the role of Mexican President Pena Nieto, who just fired the finance minister who told him to invite the Donald to Mexico City for a talk.

There are other indices the tide is turning against Clinton.

Consider the near hysteria of a media that has taken to airing charges, in echo of “Tail Gunner Joe” McCarthy, that Donald Trump is somehow the conscious agent of a Kremlin conspiracy.

Why? Because Trump accepts the compliments of Vladimir Putin and refuses to call the Russian ruler a “thug,” which is now apparently the mark of a statesman.

Moreover, when it comes to her strongest suit, foreign policy, before Clinton can elaborate on her vision, she is forced to answer for her blunders.

Why did she vote for the war in Iraq? Why did she push for the war in Libya that produced this hellish mess? Does she still defend her handling of the Benghazi massacre? What happened to her “reset” with Russia?

Most critically, when facing the press, which she has begun to do after eight months of stonewalling, she is invariably dragged into the morass of the private server, the lost-and-found emails, her inability to understand or abide by State Department rules on classified and secret documents, and FBI accusations of extreme carelessness and duplicity.

Then there are the steady stream of revelations about the Clinton Foundation raking in hundreds of millions from dictators and despots who did business with Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

Bill Clinton now describes himself as a “Robin Hood” of Sherwood Forest who took from the rich to give to the poor, with Hillary Clinton presumably cast in the role of Maid Marian of Goldman Sachs.

It is all too much to absorb.

To get her “message” out, Clinton has to punch it though a media filter. But many in this ferociously competitive and diverse media market today know that the way to the front page or top of the website is to find a new angle on the plethora of scandals, minor and major, surrounding Hillary and Bill.

And with thousands of emails still out there, the contents of which are known to her adversaries, she will likely have IEDs going off beneath her campaign all the way to November.

Consider the coughing fits, a repeated distraction from her message. Should they go away, no problem. But if they recur, people will rightly demand to know from a physician what is the cause.

Because of her own blunders, Clinton’s adversaries have achieved a large measure of control over how her campaign is reported.

In a sense this is like Watergate, where, no matter that Richard Nixon might be managing well a Yom Kippur War or a strategic summit in Moscow, the press and prosecutors cared only about the tapes.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s message has begun to come through — loud, clear and consistent.

He will secure the border. He will renegotiate the trade deals that have been killing U.S. manufacturing and costing American jobs. He will be a law-and-order president who will put America first. He will keep us out of wars like Iraq. He will talk to Vladimir Putin, smash ISIS, back the cops and the vets, and rebuild the military.

Other than being the first woman president, what is the great change that Hillary Clinton offers America?

The Clinton campaign has a big, big problem.

Share Pat’s Columns!

Source: Official Patrick J. Buchanan Blog

Conquistador Trump by Patrick J. Buchanan

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

By Patrick J. Buchanan

In accepting the invitation of President Enrique Pena Nieto to fly to Mexico City, the Donald was taking a major risk.

Yet it was a bold and decisive move, and it paid off in what was the best day of Donald Trump’s campaign.

Standing beside Nieto, graciously complimenting him and speaking warmly of Mexico and its people, Trump looked like a president. And the Mexican president treated him like one, even as Trump restated the basic elements of his immigration policy, including the border wall.

The gnashing of teeth up at The New York Times testifies to Trump’s triumph:

“Mr. Trump has spent his entire campaign painting Mexico as a nation of rapists, drug smugglers, and trade hustlers. … But instead of chastising Mr. Trump, Mr. Pena Nieto treated him like a visiting head of state … with side-by-side lecterns and words of deferential mush.”

As I wrote in August, Trump “must convince the nation … he is an acceptable, indeed, a preferable alternative” to Hillary Clinton, whom the nation does not want.

In Mexico City, Trump did that. He reassured voters who are leaning toward him that he can be president. As for those who are apprehensive about his temperament, they saw reassurance.

For validation, one need not rely on supporters of Trump. Even Mexicans who loathe Trump are conceding his diplomatic coup.

“Trump achieved his purpose,” said journalism professor Carlos Bravo Regidor. “He looked serene, firm, presidential.” Our “humiliation is now complete,” tweeted an anchorman at Televisa.

President Nieto’s invitation to Trump “was the biggest stupidity in the history of the Mexican presidency,” said academic Jesus Silva-Herzog.

Not since Gen. Winfield Scott arrived for a visit in 1847 have Mexican elites been this upset with an American.

Jorge Ramos of Univision almost required sedation.

When Trump got back to the States, he affirmed that Mexico will be paying for the wall, even if “they don’t know it yet.”

Indeed, back on American soil, in Phoenix, the Donald doubled down. Deportations will accelerate when he takes office, beginning with felons. Sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants will face U.S. sanctions. There will be no amnesty, no legalization, no path to citizenship for those who have broken into our country. All laws will be enforced.

Trump’s stance in Mexico City and Phoenix reveals that there is no turning back. The die is cast. He is betting the election on his belief that the American people prefer his stands to Clinton’s call for amnesty.

A core principle enunciated by Trump in Phoenix appears to be a guiding light behind his immigration policy.

“Anyone who tells you that the core issue is the needs of those living here illegally has simply spent too much time Washington. … There is only one core issue in the immigration debate, and that issue is the well-being of the American people. … Nothing even comes a close second.”

The “well-being of the American people” may be the yardstick by which U.S. policies will be measured in a Trump presidency. This is also applicable to Trump’s stand on trade and foreign policy.

Do NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China, the South Korea deal and TPP advance the “well-being of the American people”? Or do they serve more the interests of foreign regimes and corporate elites?

Some $12 trillion in trade deficits since George H. W. Bush gives you the answer.

Which of the military interventions and foreign wars from Serbia to Afghanistan to Iraq to Libya to Yemen to Syria served the “well-being of the American people”?

Are the American people well served by commitments in perpetuity to 60- and 65-year-old treaties to wage war on Russia and China on behalf of scores of nations across Eurasia, most of which have been free riders on U.S. defense for decades?

Trump’s “core issue” might be called Americanism.

Whatever the outcome of this election, these concerns are not going away. For they have arisen out of a deeply dissatisfied and angry electorate that is alienated from the elites both parties.

Indeed, alienation explains the endurance of Trump, despite his recent difficulties. Americans want change, and he alone offers it.

In the last two weeks, Trump has seen a slow rise in the polls, matched by a perceptible decline in support for Clinton. The latest Rasmussen poll now has Trump at 40, with Clinton slipping to 39.

This race is now Trump’s to win or lose. For he alone brings a fresh perspective to policies that have stood stagnant under both parties.

And Hillary Clinton? Whatever her attributes, she is uncharismatic, unexciting, greedy, wonkish, scripted and devious, an individual you can neither fully believe nor fully trust.

Which is why the country seems to be looking, again, to Trump, to show them that they will not be making a big mistake if they elect him.

If Donald Trump can continue to show America what he did in Mexico City, that he can be presidential, he may just become president.

Share Pat’s Columns!

Source: Official Patrick J. Buchanan Blog

FULL EVENT: Donald Trump AMAZING Full Immigration Speech in Phoenix, Arizona (August 31, 2016)

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump gives a riveting speech detailing his plans for immigration reform, if he is to become our President. This speech really has the Jews’ yarmulkes spinning.  Many on our side recently have felt disenchanted with Trump, as the Jewish media has been anticipating him selling out, and moving more towards a moderate center approach, but nevertheless he surprised everyone as he delivers a hard-hitting speech about deportation, immigration reform, and a moratorium on Muslim immigration.

Donald Trump speaks to the dispossessed White majority about their birthright to have a sovereign nation, and the right to not be flooded by Jewish controlled third-world immigration. It is now or never, if we are to turn things around politically. This election has become a referendum on whether or not the White race has the right to survive. I urge everyone this November 8th to vote for Donald J. Trump. This is a very powerful speech that will leave you inspired and re-energized after viewing.

In order to Make America Great Again, we must first and foremost Make America White Again!

Michael Jeffrey

National Bugle Radio – Slattery, Joyce: Hillary’s Alt-Right nightmare and a reassessment of Brexit

~ Michael Jeffrey ~ Leave a comment

Dr. Patrick Slattery interviewed Professor Andrew Joyce on August 28, 2016, about the phenomenon of the Alt-Right, and how the media and political establishment are trying to deal with it. Professor Joyce sees the movement as primarily a cultural reaction to the rapid demographic transformation of Western societies, where indigenous whites are being subsumed in a tsunami of third world immigrants who are being indoctrinated to resent the very whites whom they are displacing.

Professor Joyce also gave a bleak reassessment of Brexit. Although the successful vote proved that whites still have the numbers and awareness to win electorally, their efforts in the case of Brexit would better have been directed at explicit changes to immigration policy rather than exiting the EU, which in and of itself does nothing to change immigration law. He laments that there is no political leadership to build on the Brexit electoral success.

Professor Joyce is emerging as one of the leading scholars on Jewish power, and he presents information and analysis that you won’t get elsewhere.